Submissions
Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.- The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
- The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
- Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
- The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
- The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
Main Section
Further Discussions
This section receives works dedicated to the critical analysis of decisions from important Courts or Tribunals and of critical issues regarding the institutional design of the judiciary; works aimed at taking stock of previous debates hosted by the journal or that have taken place in other publications, trying to project them to the future; works dedicated to discussing the main idea of a classical or recent book or set of papers; and any other kind of research paper on the journal’s subject matters.
Participation in this section will result either from invitation by the Editor-in-chief or the Associate Editors of the section or from an external proposal. Proposals must be submitted trough the Journal’s site and they must include the following files: (1) a word file with only the identifying information of the author (name and surname, position, institutional affiliation, city, country and e-mail); (2) a word file with the proposed text prepared for a blind review; (3) a word or pdf file with the commented judicial ruling, if that is the case. Both in case of invitation or external proposal the paper will be submitted to a double-blind peer review process by two referees. The text should not exceed 10.000 words and it should abide by the writing and citation instructions.
Copyright Notice
Discusiones does not withhold rights of reproduction or copyright. Consequently, authors may share the final versions of publications. In fact, Discusiones permits and encourages authors to post their texts (be it in their submitted, accepted, or published version) on personal websites or institutional repositories while providing bibliographic details that credit its publication in this journal and without commercial uses.
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.