Raz and Bulygin on Legal Theory and Legal Statements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52292/j.dsc.2024.4925Keywords:
Legal Theory, Legal Statements, Positivism, Pure TheoryAbstract
The present paper addresses two exchanges between Eugenio Bulygin and Joseph Raz. The first exchange appeared in the book Una discusión sobre la teoría del derecho, in which Bulygin, like Robert Alexy, commented on an article by Raz “Can There Be a Theory of Law?”. The second exchange takes place in Bulygin’s essay, “Enunciados Jurídicos y Positivismo: Una Respuesta a Joseph Raz” (1981), which was a response to an article by Raz, “The Purity of the Pure Theory,” published in 1981.
Downloads
References
Adams, T. (2021). Practice and Theory in The Concept of Law. En J.
Gardner, L. Green, y B. Leiter (Eds.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law (pp. 1-31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alchourrón, C. E. y Bulygin, E. (1971). Normative Systems. Viena-Nueva York: Springer.
Alexy, R. (2007). On Two Juxtapositions: Concept and Nature, Law and Philosophy: Some Comments on Joseph Raz’s ‘Can There Be a Theory of Law? Ratio Juris, 20(2), 162-169.
Bix, B. (1995). Conceptual Questions and Jurisprudence. Legal Theory, 1(4), 465-479.
Bix, B. (2006). Raz, Authority, and Conceptual Analysis. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 50(1), 311-316.
Bix, B. (2007). Joseph Raz and Conceptual Analysis. American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Law, 6(2), 1-7.
Bulygin, E. (1981). Enunciados jurídicos y positivismo: Respuesta a Raz.
Análisis filosófico, 1, 49-59.
Bulygin, E. (2007). Raz y la teoría del derecho. Comentarios sobre “¿Puede haber una teoría del derecho?” de Joseph Raz. En J. Raz, R. Alexy, y E.
Bulygin (Eds.), Una discusión sobre la teoría del derecho (pp. 99-110).
Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Bulygin, E. (2015a). Essays in Legal Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bulygin, E. (2015b). Legal Statements and Positivism. En C. Bernal, C.
Huerta, T. Mazzarese, J. J. Moreso, P. E. Navarro, y S. L. Paulson (Eds.), Essays in Legal Philosophy (pp. 136-145). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carpentier, M. (2022). Legal Statements: Internal, External, Detached. En M. Sellers y S. Kirste (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy (pp. 2045-2052). Dordrecht: Springer.
Duarte D’Almeida, L. (2011). Legal Statements and Normative Language.
Law and Philosophy, 30, 167-199.
Finnis, J. (2011). Natural Law and Natural Rights (2da ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Green, M. S. (2016). Marmor’s Kelsen. En D. A. J. Telman (Ed.), Hans Kelsen in America (pp. 31-55). Cham: Springer.
Hart, H. L. A. (2012). The Concept of Law (3ra ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Linville, K., y Ring, M. (1991). Moore’s Paradox Revisited. Synthese, 87, 295-309.
Morawetz, T. (1999). Law as Experience: Theory and the Internal Aspect of Law. SMU Law Review, 52(1), 27-66.
Moreso Mateos, J. J. (2021). Eugenio Bulygin (1931-2021): The Wonderful Russian. Ratio Juris, 34(3), 282-285.
Paulson, S. (2012). A ‘Justified Normativity’ Thesis in Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law?: Rejoinders to Robert Alexy and Joseph Raz. En M.
Klatt (Ed.), Institutionalized Reason: The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy (pp. 61-111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Raz, J. (1981). The Purity of the Pure Theory. Revue International de Philosophie, 35(138), 441-459.
Raz, J. (1990). Practical Reason and Norms. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
Raz, J. (2005). Can There Be a Theory of Law? En M. y. E. Golding, W.
(Eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (pp. 324-342). Oxford: Blackwell.
Raz, J. (2007a). ¿Puede haber una teoría del derecho? En J. Raz, R. Alexy, y E. Bulygin (Eds.), Una discusión sobre la teoría del derecho (pp. 47-86).
Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Raz, J. (2007b). Teoría y conceptos. Réplica a Alexy y Bulygin. En J. Raz, R. Alexy, y E. Bulygin (Eds.), Una discusión sobre la teoría del derecho (pp. 111-126). Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Raz, J. (2009a). The Authority of Law : Essays on Law and Morality (2da ed.).
Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
Raz, J. (2009b). Between Authority and Interpretation: On the Theory of Law and Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Raz, J., Alexy, R., y Bulygin, E. (2007). Una discusión sobre la teoría del derecho. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Redondo, M. C. (2021). Bulygin’s Analytical Legal Positivism. En T. Spaak y P. Mindus (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Legal Positivism (pp.
-393). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toh, K. (2007). Raz on Detachment, Acceptance and Describability. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 27(3), 403-427.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Brian Bix
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Discusiones does not withhold rights of reproduction or copyright. Consequently, authors may share the final versions of publications.
