The human factor in Argentine agriculture

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2021.2269

Keywords:

Labor, Agricultural sector, Elasticity of substitution

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to identify determinants of the reductions in the use of labor observed in Argentine agriculture. The paper focuses on the 2002-2018 period, using data from the last two publications of the Censo Nacional Agropecuario (the census undertaken in 2008 is incomplete). The paper summarizes trends of labor use and firm size in Argentina, and presents three possible hypothesis accounting for the observed changes: (a) capital-labor substitution, (b) labor-saving technical change (reduced and no-tillage), and (c) changes in the farm size and the types of capital (machines) used.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bour, J. L. (1996). Procesos de reforma del mercado de trabajo en Argentina. (Manuscrito inédito). Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Fundación de Investigaciones Económicas Latinoamericanas (FIEL).

CREA. (2020). Agroseries Online Economía. Consultado en noviembre 2020 y recuperado de https://www.crea.org.ar/agroseries-on-line/.

Evenson, R. E. (1988). Human Capital and Agricultural Productivity Change. (Economic Growth Center, Yale University, Center Discussion Paper No. 566). Recuperado de https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/160488/1/cdp566.pdf

Gallacher, M., & Lema, D. (2018). Returns to Management Ability and Technical Efficiency in Argentina Dairy Farms. Paper presented at the Conference of the International Association of Agricultural Economists, Vancouver, Columbia Británica.

Gallacher, M. (2010). Capital humano y eficiencia productiva en la agricultura argentina. En L. Reca, D. Lema y C. Flood (eds.). La Agricultura Argentina: Medio Siglo de Logros y Desafíos (cap. 16, pp. 391400). Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires.

Gallacher, M. (2011). Returns to Managerial Ability: Dairy Farms in Argentina. (Universidad del CEMA, Serie Documentos de Trabajo No. 478). Recuperado de https://ucema.edu.ar/publicaciones/download/documentos/478.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2026051

INDEC. (2021). Censo Nacional Agropecuario 2002 y 2018. Recuperado de https://www.indec.gob.ar/indec/web/Nivel4-Tema-3-8-87

International Labor Organization. (2020). Rural and Urban Labor Markets, Different Challenges for Promoting Decent Work. (ILO, Spotlight on Work Statistics No.11). Recuperado de https://ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---stat/documents/publication/wcms_757960.pdf

Márgenes Agropecuarios, 2002 and 2018, issues corresponding to the month of April of each year. Data on labor and machinery services costs (Table “Costo de siembra y pulverizacion”)

Nocelli Pac, S. (2018). Evolución de la Siembra Directa en Argentina. Campaña 2016-2017. Rosario: Asociación Argentina de Productores de Siembra Directa (AAPRESID). Recuperado de https://www.aapresid.org.ar/wpcontent/uploads/2018/03/Estimacio%CC%81n-de-superficien-en-SD.pdf

Pisani Claro, N. & Mazo, D. (2019). El campo argentino en números 2019. Río Cuarto, Córdoba: Fundación Agropecuaria para el Desarrollo de Argentina (FADA). Recuperado de https://fundacionfada.org/informes/el-campo-argentino-en-numeros-4/

Taboada, M., Lema, D., Maceira, N., Echeverría, H, Posse, G., Prieto, D., …& Mastrángelo, M. (2017). Los desafíos de la agricultura argentina: satisfacer las futuras demandas y reducir el impacto ambiental. Compilado por Fernando H. Andrade. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Ediciones INTA. Recuperado de https://inta.gob.ar/sites/default/files/lib_desafiosagricultura_2017_online_b.pdf

Wei, T. (2013). Estimation of substitution elasticities in agriculture. (Unpublished manuscript). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2334216

World Development Indicators (November, 2020). Data on total and agricultural labor. Recuperado de http://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-developmentindicators/

Downloads

Published

2021-05-03

How to Cite

Gallacher, M. (2021). The human factor in Argentine agriculture. Estudios económicos, 38(77), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2021.2269

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)