Choices of graduates and firms among models of education from employability view

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2022.2303

Keywords:

Higher Education Models, Recruitment and Selection, Students and Managers' Choices, Employability, Human Resources

Abstract

The objective of the article is to evaluate the existence of consonance between the choice of graduates in the area of management and business among the Humboldtian (German) and Napoleonic (French) higher education models and the training required by firms in the hiring process. For undergraduate students, through electronic questionnaires, 281 responses were collected from 06 higher education institutions. For the managers of the human resources area, through the quasi-experimental method, 45 participations were obtained. The analyzes concluded that the majority of students prefer teaching based on the Humboldtian model, while companies prefer students of this model for strategic level vacancies; and students from the Napoleonic model for the operational ones. Operational vacancies predominate in the offer over strategic ones.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexandre, J. W. C., Andrade, D. F. de, Vasconcelos, A. P. de, Araujo, A. M. S. da, & Batista, M. J. (2003). Análise do número de categorias da escala de Likert aplicada à gestão pela qualidade total através da teoria da resposta ao item. In XXIII Encontro Nac. de Eng. de Produção. Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil.

Altbach, P. G. (2013). Advancing the national and global knowledge economy: The role of research universities in developing countries. Studies in Higher Education, 38(3), 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.773222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.773222

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Design for Research. In D. Geneva & N. J. Hopewell (Orgs.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (1963). https://doi.org/10.1037/022808 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/022808

Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Christiane, G., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29, 313–330. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4

Ferreira, S. (2010). Reforma Da Educação Superior No Brasil E Na Europa: Em Debate Novos Papéis Sociais Para As Universidades. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14572/nuances.v17i18.724

Fragoso, A., Valadas, S. T., & Paulos, L. (2019). Ensino Superior E Empregabilidade: Perceções De Estudantes E Graduados, Empregadores E Acadêmicos. Educação & Sociedade, 40(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1590/es0101-73302019186612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/es0101-73302019186612

Hammershøj, L. G. (2018). The perfect storm scenario for the university: Diagnosing converging tendencies in higher education. Futures, (June), 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.001

Helal, D. H., & Rocha, M. (2011). O discurso da empregabilidade: o que pensam a academia e o mundo empresarial. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 9(1), 139–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-39512011000100009

Hennemann, S., & Liefner, I. (2010). Employability of german geography graduates: The mismatch between knowledge acquired and competences required. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 34(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260903227400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260903227400

Infante, V. S. (1998). Competitividade e empregabilidade oferecida pela universidade: o caso Brasileiro. III Congreso Internacional del CLAD sobre la Reforma del Estado y de la Administración Pública, 14–17. Madrid.

Kőnig, L. S., Juric, P. M., & Koprivnjak, T. (2016). Graduate Employability : A Gap between Perspectives – the Case of Croatia. Advances in Economics and Business, 4(10), 525–538. https://doi.org/10.13189/aeb.2016.041002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/aeb.2016.041002

Luckmann, L. C., & Bernart, E. E. (2014). Da universidade clássica à universidade brasileira: aproximações e desdobramentos. Unoesc & Ciência – ACHS, Joaçaba, 5(2), 211–220. Recuperado de https://portalperiodicos.unoesc.edu.br/achs/article/view/5786

Mansour, B. El, & Dean, J. C. (2016). Employability Skills as Perceived by Employers and University Faculty in the Fields of Human Resource Development ( HRD ) for Entry Level Graduate Jobs. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 4(March), 39–49. Recuperado de http://www.scirp.org/journal/jhrss http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2016.41005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2016.41005

Marcon, M. (2020). Escolhas de Graduandos da Área de Gestão e Negócios e das Firmas Entre os Modelos Instituidores de Ensino Superior Humboldtiano e Napoleônico: Uma Abordgem Sob a Perspectiva da Empregabilidade. Dissertação. Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

Mccowan, T. (2015). Should universities promote employability? Theory and Research in Education, 13(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878515598060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878515598060

Muller, R. F. (2017). A perceção de empregabilidade dos Brasileiros graduados em Administração / Gestão de Empresas. Universidade do Porto, Cidade do Porto.

Pereira, E. M. de A. (2009). A universidade da modernidade nos tempos atuais. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior, 14(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1414-40772009000100003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-40772009000100003

Prota, L. (1987). UM NOVO MODELO DE UNIVERSIDADE. São Paulo: Convívio.

Sam, C., & Sijde, P. van der. (2014). Understanding the concept of the entrepreneurial university from the perspective of higher education models. Higher Education, 68(6), 891–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9750-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9750-0

Schwartzman, S. (2008). Ciência, universidade e ideologia: a política do conhecimento. In Ciência, universidade e ideologia: a política do conhecimento. Rio de Janeiro: Centro Edelstein de Pesquisas Sociais. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7476/9788599662502

Schwartzman, S., & Klein, L. (1994). Higher Education and Government in Brazil,. In Pergamon Press and the International Association of Universities (Org.), Government and Higher Education Relationships Across Three Continents: the winds of change (Vol 2). Recuperado de http://www.schwartzman.org.br/simon/vught.htm

Singam, K. (2017). Review on Graduates’ Unemployment in Sri Lanka and the Globe. Global Journal of HUMAN-SOCIAL SCIENCE: G Linguistics & Education, 17(8), 42–52.

Teixeira, A. (1989). Ensino superior no Brasil: análise e interpretação de sua evolução até 1969. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getúlio Vargas.

Tomlinson, M. (2008). The degree is not enough: Students’ perceptions of the role of higher education credentials for graduate work and employability. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690701737457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690701737457

Tomlinson, M. (2012). Graduate employability: A review of conceptual and empirical themes. Higher Education Policy, 25(4), 407–431. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2011.26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2011.26

Downloads

Published

2022-01-05

How to Cite

Marcon, M., & Alves, T. W. (2022). Choices of graduates and firms among models of education from employability view. Estudios económicos, 39(78), 61–96. https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2022.2303

Issue

Vol. 39 No. 78 (2022)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 tribución-No Comercial 4.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 4.0) de Creative Commons.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The authors who publish in Estudios económicos agree to the following terms:

The authors retain copyright and guarantee to the journal the right to be the first to publish the work as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.

Authors may separately enter into additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC