This is an outdated version published on 2015-11-11. Read the most recent version.

Let it float: new empirical evidence on de facto exchange rate regimes and growth in Latin America

Authors

  • Cecilia Bermúdez CONICET - IIESS, Argentina
  • Carlos Dabús CONICET - IIESS, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2015.729

Keywords:

Exchange rate regimes, Economic growth, System GMM

Abstract

This paper reassesses the evidence presented in Levy-Yeyati and Sturzenegger (LYS) (2003) on the relation between exchange rate regimes and economic growth. We use their de facto classification as well as their database, in order to gain robustness and efficiency in the results. We run System GMM estimations. Additionally, we focus on Latin American countries for the period 1974-2004. Differently to LYS, our evidence indicates that exchange rate regimes are not significant to explain economic growth, both in a worldwide sample of countries and particularly in Latin America. However, in this region flexible regimes appear to have more advantages in terms of the role of the determinants of economic growth in relation to the other exchange regimes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angrist, J., & Krueger, A. (2001). Instrumental variables and the search for identification: from supply and demand to natural experiments, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (4), 69-85.

Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations, Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297.

Arellano, M., Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models, Journal of Econometrics, 68 (1), 29-51.

Bailliu, J., Lafrance, R., & Perrault, J. (2003). Does exchange rate policy matter for growth? International Finance, 6 (3), 381-414.

Barro, R., (1997). Determinants of economic growth: a cross-country empirical study, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Baxter, M., & Stockman, A. (1989). Business cycles and the exchange-rate regime: some international evidence, Journal of Monetary Economics, 23, 377-400.

Beck, T. (2008). The econometrics of finance and growth, World Bank Policy Research, Working Paper Series No. 4608.

Bermúdez, C., Dabús, C., & González, G. (2012): Inestabilidad y crecimiento económico: evidencia de América Latina. En S. N. Keifman. Progresos en Crecimiento Económico (pp. 117-165), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Fondo Editorial Consejo.

Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel-data models, Journal of Econometrics, 87 (1), 115-143

Bordo, M., & Schwartz, A. (1999). Monetary policy regimes and economic perfomance: the historical record. In Handbook of Macroeconomics Vol. 1A (pp. 149-234). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Broda, C. (2001). Coping with terms-of-trade shocks: peg versus floats. American Economic Review, 91 (2), 376-380.

Calvo, G., & Reinhart, C. (2002). Fear of floating, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (2), 379-408.

Cooper, R., Dornbusch, R., & Hall, R. (1982). The gold standard: historical facts and future prospects, Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 1982, 1-56.

De Gregorio, José (1992): The effects of inflation on economic growth: Lessons from Latin America, European Economic Review, 36 (2-3), 417-425.

Eichengreen, B., Rose A., & Wyplosz, C. (1994). Speculative attacks on pegged exchange rate: an empirical exploration with special reference to the European Monetary System, NBER, Working Paper No. 4898.

Fischer, S. (2001). Exchange rate regimes: is the bipolar view correct?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (2), 3-24.

Ghosh, A., Gulde, A., Ostry, J. & Wolf, H. (1996). Does the exchange rate regime matter for inflation and economic growth?, Economic Issues, 2, Washington, D.C., International Monetary Fund.

Ghosh, A., Gulde, A., Ostry, J., & Wolf, H. (1997). Does the nominal exchange rate regime matter?. NBER, Working Paper Series No. 5874.

Ghosh, A., Gulde, A. & Wolf, H. (2000). Currency boards: more than a quick fix?, Economic Policy, 15 (31), 269-335.

Larraín, F. & Velasco., A. (2001). Exchange rate policy in emerging market economies: the case for floating. Princeton University, Essays in International Economics No. 224.

Levine, R., & Renelt, D., (1992). A sensitivity analysis of cross -country regressions, American Economic Review, 82 (4), 942-63.

Levy-Yeyati, E., & Sturzenegger, F. (2003). To float or to fix: evidence on the impact of exchange rate regimes on growth. American Economic Review, 93 (4), 1173-1193.

Mac Donald, R., (2000). The role of the exchange rate in economic growth: a Euro-zone perspective. National Bank of Belgium, Working Papers Research Series No. 9.

Meltzer (1986). Some evidence on the comparative uncertainty under different monetary regimes. In C.D. Campbell and W.R. Dougan (Eds.). Alternative Monetary Regimes. (pp. 122-153). Baltimore M.D.: John Hopkins University Press.

Miles, W. (2006). To float or not to float? Currency regimes and growth. Journal of Economic Development, 31 (2), 91-105.

Mills, T., & Wood G., (1993). Does the exchange rate regime affect the economy?. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 75 (4), 3-20.

Mundell, R., (1995). Exchange rate systems and economic growth. In M. C. Marcuzzo, L. H. Officer, & A. Rosselli (Eds.). Monetary Standars and Exchange Rate. (pp. 13-38). London: Routledge.

Mussa, M., (1986). Nominal exchange rate regimes and the behavior of real exchange rates: evidence and implications. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 25, 117-214.

Ramey, G., & Ramey, V., (1995). Cross-country evidence on the link between volatility and growth. American Economic Review, 85 (5), 1138-1151.

Rolnick, A., & Weber. W. (1997). Money, inflation, and output under fiat and commodity standards. Journal of Political Economy, 105 (6), 1308-1321.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-11

Versions

How to Cite

Bermúdez, C., & Dabús, C. (2015). Let it float: new empirical evidence on de facto exchange rate regimes and growth in Latin America. Estudios económicos, 32(65), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2015.729

Issue

Vol. 32 No. 65 (2015)

Section

Articles

License

The authors who publish in Estudios económicos agree to the following terms:

The authors retain copyright and guarantee to the journal the right to be the first to publish the work as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.

Authors may separately enter into additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC