El efecto asimétrico del ciclo económico sobre las condiciones sociales argentinas en el período 2003 - 2015

Authors

  • Guido Zack Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política de Buenos Aires - Universidad de Buenos Aires – CONICET, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2016.718

Keywords:

Poverty, Growth, Income distribution, Business cycle, Argentina, Living conditions

Abstract

After the crisis of 2002, Argentina started a process of strong social condition recovery, which slowed from 2007 and has stagnated since 2012. Present situation is slightly better in relation to the 1990s, but worse if the comparison is made with previous decades. Despite the high growth experienced until 2011, income distribution was the main cause of the improvement in poverty and extreme poverty. This article  investigates the risk of reversing in the coming years part of the recovery achieved. This risk is based on the possible asymmetric effect of the business cycle on social conditions, analyzed through the growth and income distribution elasticities of poverty and extreme poverty estimated for the 2003 – 2015 period.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, R. H. (2004). Economic growth, inequality and poverty: estimating the growth elasticity of poverty. World Development32(12), 1989-2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.08.006

Adelman, I., & Morris, C. T. (1973). Economic growth and social equity in deve-loping countries. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

Agénor, P. R. (2004). Macroeconomic adjustment and the poor: analytical issues and cross country Evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 18 (3), 351-408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0950-0804.2004.00225.x

Ahluwalia, M. S. (1974). Income inequality: some dimensions of the problem. Finance and Development, 11(3), 2.

Ahluwalia, M. S. (1976). Income distribution and development: some stylized facts. The American Economic Review, 66(2), 128-135.

Bhalla, S. S. (2002). Imagine there’s no country: Poverty, inequality, and growth in the era of globalization. Washington D. C.: Peterson Institute.

BID (1995). Overcoming Volatility. Economic and Social Progress in Latin Ame-rica 1995 Report. Washington D.C.: BID.

Bourguignon, F. (2003). The growth elasticity of poverty reduction: explaining he-terogeneity across countries and time periods. En T. Eicher & S. Turnovsky (Eds.). Inequality and growth: Theory and policy implications (pp. 3-26). Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Breen, R. & García-Peñalosa, C. (2005). Income inequality and macroeconomic volatility: An empirical investigation. Review of Development Economics, 9(3), 380-398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2005.00283.x

Bruno, M., Ravallion, M., & Squire, L. (1998). Equity and growth in developing countries: old and new perspectives on the policy issues. En V. Tanzi & K. Chu (Eds.). Income distribution and high-quality growth. (pp. 117-146). Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-1563

Busso, M., Cerimedo, F. & Cicowiez, M. (2005). Pobreza, crecimiento y des-igualdad: descifrando la última década en Argentina. Centro de Estudios Distributivos, Laborales y Sociales, Documento de Trabajo No. 21.

Calderón, C., & Levy Yeyati, E. (2009). Zooming in From Aggregate Volatility to In-come Distribution.The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper No. 4895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4895

Cline, W. R. (1975). Distribution and development: A survey of literature. Journal of Development Economics, 1(4), 359-400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(75)90019-X

Datt, G., & Ravallion, M. (1992). Growth and redistribution components of chan-ges in poverty measures: A decomposition with applications to Brazil and India in the 1980s. Journal of development economics, 38(2), 275-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(92)90001-P

De Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2000). Growth, poverty, and inequality in Latin America: A causal analysis, 1970–94. Review of Income and Wealth, 46(3), 267-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2000.tb00843.x

Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49 (4), 1057-1072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1912517

Fang, W., Miller, S. M., & Yeh, C. C. (2015). The effect of growth volatility on income inequality. Economic Modelling, 45, 212-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.11.020

Fields, G. S. (1980), Poverty, Inequality, and Development. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511572173

Fields, G. S. (1989). Changes in poverty and inequality in developing countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 4(2), 167-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/4.2.167

Gasparini, L., Gutiérrez, F., & Tornarolli, L. (2007). Growth and income poverty in Latin America and the Caribbean: evidence from household surveys. Review of Income and Wealth, 53(2), 209-245. Gasparini, L., Cicowiez, M. & Escudero, W. S. (2013). Pobreza y desigualdad en América Latina. Conceptos, herramientas y aplicaciones. Buenos Aires: Te-mas. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2007.00231.x

Hausmann, R., & Gavin, M. (1996). Securing Stability and Growth in a Shock Prone Region: The Policy Challenge for Latin America. Inter-American Development Bank, Working Paper No. 315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1815944

Kravis, I. (1960). International Differences in the Distribution of Income. Review of Economics and Statistics,42(4), 408-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1925690

Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Eco-nomic Review, 45(1), 1-28.

Laursen, T., & Mahajan, S. (2004). Volatility, income distribution, and poverty. En J. Aizenman, & B. Pinto Managing (Eds). Volatility and crises. A practitio-ner guide (pp. 101-136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510755.006

Ljung, G. M., & Box, G. E. P. (1978). On a measure of a lack of fi t in time series models. Biometrika, 65(2), 297–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/65.2.297

Locke Anderson, W. H. (1964). Trickling down: the relationship between econo-mic growth and the extent of poverty among american families. The Quar-terly Journal of Economics, 78(4), 511-524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1879653

Lustig, N. (2000). Crises and the Poor: Socially responsible macroeconomics. Inter-American Development Bank, Technical Papers Series No. POV-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.214994

MacKinnon, J. G. (1991). Critical Values for Cointegration Tests. En R. F. Engel ,& C. Granger (Eds.). Long Run Economic Relationship. (pp. 267-276). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mahmoudi, V. (mayo, 2001). Growth-equity decomposition of a change in pover-ty: an application to Iran. Trabajo presentado en UNU/WIDER Develop-ment conference on growth and poverty, Helsinki, Finlandia.

Medina, F. & Galván, M. (2014). Crecimiento económico, pobreza y distribución del ingreso: Fundamentos teóricos y evidencia empírica para América Latina, 1997-2007. Serie Estudios Estadísticos No. 82, Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

Published

2016-11-05 — Updated on 2021-11-12

How to Cite

Zack, G. (2021). El efecto asimétrico del ciclo económico sobre las condiciones sociales argentinas en el período 2003 - 2015. Estudios económicos, 33(67), 67–96. https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2016.718

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)